From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Kost Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add mpv-minimal. Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 18:29:44 +0300 Message-ID: <87r3iaim1j.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87d1um2o3f.fsf@gmail.com> <20151204171327.GD6556@debian> <87poykbui6.fsf@gmail.com> <20151205212843.249e6062@debian-netbook> <20151205204918.GB28666@debian> <87io3pmuyg.fsf@gmail.com> <20151223214839.59c0ff2b@debian-netbook> <87y4ckutt1.fsf@gmail.com> <700B0BC3-5E6C-4298-AE63-0011885B2883@flashner.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42824) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCUJS-0006XJ-38 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 10:29:50 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCUJO-00067F-UF for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 10:29:50 -0500 Received: from mail-lb0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::235]:35049) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCUJO-00066P-JI for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 10:29:46 -0500 Received: by mail-lb0-x235.google.com with SMTP id bc4so70301525lbc.2 for ; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 07:29:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <700B0BC3-5E6C-4298-AE63-0011885B2883@flashner.co.il> (Efraim Flashner's message of "Thu, 24 Dec 2015 11:14:30 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Efraim Flashner Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Efraim Flashner (2015-12-24 12:14 +0300) wrote: [...] > I looked at the MPV github page and the syntax for MPV over built-in > samba is 'mpv smb://user:password@host:/full/path/to/file.ext' and > without tab completion and without support for .netrc or .smb.conf I > would never do that. Once the directory is mounted locally it doesn't > need samba to play networked content. > > Now that I've looked at it more it seems samba support isn't really a > useful feature for mpv. Great news, thanks for looking at it! Now this looks like a not-very-common feature indeed. I'll wait for other objections for a week or so before removing 'samba' input from 'mpv' package (although I would still prefer to have an 'mpv-minimal' package). -- Alex