From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add sonata Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 08:18:07 +0100 Message-ID: <87r3fwassw.fsf@elephly.net> References: <1455830814-4977-1-git-send-email-mail@cbaines.net> <1455830814-4977-3-git-send-email-mail@cbaines.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47652) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aaI60-00085e-Cl for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 02:18:21 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aaI5v-0000b2-9j for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 02:18:20 -0500 Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com ([74.201.84.163]:25995) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aaI5v-0000ay-1M for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 02:18:15 -0500 In-reply-to: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "Thompson, David" Cc: guix-devel Thompson, David writes: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Christopher Baines wrote: >> * gnu/packages/mpd.scm (sonata): New variable. > > This is really cool, thanks! Sonata was my main music player back in > the day and I'm glad to see that it's being maintained again. I > cleaned it up somewhat, built it, and ran it. I'm hesitant to push > the patch right now, though, and I hope someone who knows more about > Python can help me clear some things up. > > I don't like that gtk+ and gobject-introspection need to be propagated > Could anyone familiar with creating Python bindings for C libraries > tell me if it would be possible to patch pygobject to include the > absolute path to the gtk+ and gobject-introspection libraries? This > has been the strategy for avoiding propagation of C libraries within > Guile packages, and I'm hoping it applies here. Yeah, propagating gtk+ is bad. I’d like to remove it from all packages that currently do this. It bloats profiles and causes conflicts. ~~ Ricardo