From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/13] utils: Use '@' for separating package names and
	version numbers.
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2016 12:16:35 +0300
Message-ID: <87r3fpxp1o.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <1453666771-16869-1-git-send-email-mthl@gnu.org>
	<1453666771-16869-5-git-send-email-mthl@gnu.org>
	<87h9i1evp5.fsf@gmail.com> <8737tl4bve.fsf@gnu.org>
	<877fiwpayr.fsf@gnu.org> <87k2m0cto5.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87vb5flm0q.fsf@gnu.org> <87wppo1hso.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87k2ljzwf6.fsf@gmail.com> <877fhhhmmm.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57220)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1ac8K6-0003Ie-Mt
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2016 04:16:31 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1ac8K3-0000vd-H7
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2016 04:16:30 -0500
In-Reply-To: <877fhhhmmm.fsf@gnu.org> (Mathieu Lirzin's message of "Sat, 05
	Mar 2016 00:03:13 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Mathieu Lirzin (2016-03-05 02:03 +0300) wrote:

> Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Mathieu Lirzin (2016-02-29 03:28 +0300) wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>> I have left the emacs interface untouched.
>>
>> Hm, I wonder why?  You already had the required changes in your initial
>> patch.  Anyway, I'm attaching the patch with these changes.  The only
>> difference from your original patch is replacing 'package-full-name'
>> with 'make-package-specification' in "guix-main.scm".
>
> The concern of backward compability that Ludo raised, have made the work
> more challenging than changing things in place.  As a consequence it was
> not clear to me what should/can change or not.  To keep my mind clear, I
> have decided to leave the emacs part unchanged.  So the true reason is
> exhaustion.  :)

Fair enough!  And thanks for your work, now you are a very knowledgeable
person in this "name@version" part of code!

-- 
Alex