From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: iyzsong@member.fsf.org (=?utf-8?B?5a6L5paH5q2m?=)
Subject: Re: Gnome-updates
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 22:31:39 +0800
Message-ID: <87r3dr3yyc.fsf@member.fsf.org>
References: <20160426173717.GA4754@solar> <87potb19ih.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37423)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <iyzsong@openmailbox.org>) id 1avQVZ-0007qJ-Cb
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 10:32:11 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <iyzsong@openmailbox.org>) id 1avQVU-0005pd-OJ
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 10:32:05 -0400
Received: from smtp12.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.46]:58466)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <iyzsong@openmailbox.org>) id 1avQVU-0005pT-IY
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 10:32:00 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87potb19ih.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?=
	=?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Wed, 27 Apr 2016 15:11:50 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes:

> Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:
>
>> the gnome-updates branch has built on x86, and compared to master, there=
 are
>> not that many regressions:
>>    http://hydra.gnu.org/eval/108921?compare=3Dmaster#tabs-now-fail
>
> In fact this slightly overestimates the failures compared to master; in
> particular, all the Octave/Fltk-related failures are already in master.
>
>> I saw a few that seem to be related to fonts and freetype, but I am not
>> a specialist. Do you think we could nevertheless merge back to master?
>> In any case, it would be nice if people who are competent in these matte=
rs
>> could have a look at the few remaining build failures.
>
> Since =E2=80=98make assert-binaries-available=E2=80=99 passed, I went ahe=
ad and merge
> the branch.
Oh, luckily the merge doesn't have effect.
>
> If anything goes wrong, please let us know!
Sorry, this is still not ready yet!  I have skip a gjs test temporary,
and disable the spell plugin of gedit.  I'd continue to work on the
gnome-updates branch, and will reply to this thread when it's ok.