From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mathieu Lirzin Subject: Re: [PATCH] ui: 'package->recutils' serializes the source field. Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 19:53:32 +0200 Message-ID: <87r39zcfkz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160805145804.26753-1-david@craven.ch> <87y44af52m.fsf@gmail.com> <87shuit01e.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg60g79l.fsf@gnu.org> <87a8gog154.fsf@gnu.org> <87vazcce0a.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53631) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bWok9-0005aA-1C for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 13:53:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bWok4-0007sf-UC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 13:53:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: (David Craven's message of "Mon, 8 Aug 2016 13:20:22 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: David Craven Cc: guix-devel , Alex Kost David Craven writes: > Quoting Ludo from the thread you mentioned: > >> (Besides, our package meta-data would probably still refer to the =E2=80= =9Creal=E2=80=9D >> home page of the package, from which it=E2=80=99s trivial to get the unm= odified >> tarball.) > > The discussion only applies to 'guix build --source' and I can't see any > indication from reading the thread that displaying the original source url > would be in any way problematic. Can you quote something from that > thread that would indicate otherwise? I don't need to quote anything to think that: - Providing a user tool to fetch a tarball - Displaying a direct link to a tarball in our UI ... have the same "steer users" effect.=20=20 Feel free to disagree, however when doubt emerges about FSDG compliance, a consensus needs to be reached on . If you want your change to be included in Guix, please start a discussion on that mailing list explaining what you are proposing and ask if other people thinks this is OK in regards of the FSDG. --=20 Mathieu Lirzin