From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: 23/36: gnu: Add libkdepim.
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 21:47:12 +0100
Message-ID: <87r1z62khb.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20200203134554.28985.49673@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
 <20200203134603.BDAB420A10@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
 <875zgmugtx.fsf@gnu.org>
 <a6b89325-4ff6-7989-d4a8-b192f1b2d7dc@crazy-compilers.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59058)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1j0AX5-0003WW-Gy
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2020 15:47:24 -0500
In-Reply-To: <a6b89325-4ff6-7989-d4a8-b192f1b2d7dc@crazy-compilers.com>
 (Hartmut Goebel's message of "Wed, 5 Feb 2020 10:31:41 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel"
 <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: Hartmut Goebel <h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com>
Cc: Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

Hi,

Hartmut Goebel <h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com> skribis:

> Am 04.02.20 um 23:29 schrieb Ludovic Court=C3=A8s:
>> This must get us close to full coverage of the core of KDE, no?
>
> Well, nor t yet. I have yet another approx. 100 packages hanging around.

Woow.

>>> +    (synopsis "Libraries for common kdepim apps")
>>> +    (description "Libraries for common kdepim apps.")
>> I know it=E2=80=99s no fun, but could you try to follow the guidelines f=
or
>> synopses and descriptions at:
>
> Whet exactly is your point?

I should have been more specific: could you try to expound a bit the
descriptions and write full sentences?  I understand it=E2=80=99s going to =
be
difficult if upstream doesn=E2=80=99t bother to provide a README, so it=E2=
=80=99ll
clearly be best effort, no problem!

Ludo=E2=80=99.