From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id EGHSDDJkvV5XQQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 15:30:58 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id wNEWBzJkvV7uWgAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 15:30:58 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63CAC94050F for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 15:30:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:54634 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jZFp2-0000WX-4N for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 14 May 2020 11:30:56 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51902) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jZFop-0000Uw-W6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 May 2020 11:30:44 -0400 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:44760) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jZFoo-0002Ud-Fv for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 May 2020 11:30:43 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE677160066 for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 17:30:38 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1589470238; bh=10+pCaBZ/Po0/vIISYQMuTB4dk5N6wAbd/CpNFdQnGs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=duCxGiGigpgo0Ik5XrFTMGVD29vnzDiJE3rhqf5992O2+bByOQUpBwdRpFvvSL4Tw jWaJenI6MGgxGTTP6HhcwGLhZUCmm4T6/sGpbi8ccVDYLbN3B9vPk2XRo8S7mEpvus i6ffGOHtmDNmUf79jY4lsyTXQriBRfrLXj7yPnTNmWkBTp+e1mQtXSKfwLUEKpv3Ve fW1wP9bpEo7XYqHdSV2aZuyKPljaP01XzQpunRDRN/F7GFNuT+GQOpX0jyFEgtDO/2 RBkSrbQ1WZcNBU0rwXl+uqdCjhLKsZ4MdKzA+45gmF4yKf1mgEQek6htAhV2KTlbmO oz5wTJKldoA6w== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 49NFqJ2DBtz9ryH; Thu, 14 May 2020 17:30:36 +0200 (CEST) References: <87mu6hw5dg.fsf@yamatai> <87o8qww5if.fsf@yamatai> <87r1vr1qju.fsf@devup.no> <87o8qv4g7n.fsf@yucca> <874ksmhkvl.fsf@yamatai> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.4; emacs 26.3 From: Guillaume Le Vaillant To: guix-devel Subject: Re: Some packages failing to build In-reply-to: <874ksmhkvl.fsf@yamatai> Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 17:30:35 +0200 Message-ID: <87r1vmh6uc.fsf@yamatai> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=glv@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/14 11:30:39 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Vagrant Cascadian Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=duCxGiGi; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (strict)" header.from=posteo.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.01 X-TUID: is0HRdnbBhat --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Guillaume Le Vaillant skribis: > Vagrant Cascadian skribis: > >> On 2020-05-10, Marius Bakke wrote: >>> Guillaume Le Vaillant writes: >>> >>>> Guillaume Le Vaillant skribis: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> After pulling guix with the merged core updates (guix at commit >>>>> 95ffdfe86cb1b8a8e4fff1386a147718400b76e0), I found a few packages >>>>> failing to build: >>>>> >>>>> - fbreader >>>>> - gnubg >>>>> - gnubik >>>>> - postgis >>>>> - python-cheetah >>>>> - python-trezor >>>>> >>>>> I have not yet had the time to try and fix them, so I just list them >>>>> here in case someone wants to take a look at them. >>>> >>>> Update: postgis and python-cheetah fixed. >>> >>> fbreader, gnubg and gnubik fixed. >> >> Updating python-trezor to 0.12.0 fixed it; pushed to master. > > Hi, thanks for the fixes. > > I found a few other build failures: > > - bitcoin-abc > - bitcoin-core > - bitcoin-unlimited > > > There is also the wsjtx package that builds fine but starting the > program fails with: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > /home/guillaume/.guix-profile/bin/wsjtx: symbol lookup error: > /home/guillaume/.guix-profile/bin/wsjtx: undefined symbol: fmodf, > version GLIBCXX_3.4.3 > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > However, doing a "ldd $(guix build wsjtx)/bin/.wsjtx-real" shows that > the libm.so.6 library that contains the fmodf function is in the > dependencies. Do you have an idea what could cause the symbol lookup to > fail? I pushed a workaround for wsjtx as b79794a7630a04668d2769aee50ebc25e0d7c3d2. I'm not fully satisfied by it as I don't yet know why the libraries would get in the wrong order when linking the program. But well, at least it starts now. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQQkUwKxurH4Z/3KlryPP4Yfgut6mgUCXr1kGwAKCRCPP4Yfgut6 mkGJAQC21CoKz/DLtBgfLqvttj50SysSx793d4FEPmoMr2g7AwD+IdXAO4Ub+O9o ZDloX3MngdvbMONFVHdTyUir5Zesygc= =yPr8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--