zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi Chris,
>
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 21:41, Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> wrote:
>
>> > First, Chris could you add the fields package name and version?  Because
>> > it is hard to automatically reconstruct them by parsing the output-path.
>>
>> Done in [1], and I've updated data.guix-patches.cbaines.net.
>
> Neat!  I have updated my script.  Now, I need to add some build-system
> support to easy the triage.  Keep you in touch.
>
> Thank you.
>
>> > (A working revision is 6cf35799dec60723f37d83a559429aa8b90482d5 which
>> > does not seems founding in Guix repo.)
>>
>> So, that particular commit is just some revision of Guix with some
>> patches applied. I picked it because it was the most recent
>> data. There's now recent commits for the master branch itself [2] like
>> [3].
>
> Can I expect that all the revisions are there?  Or only some?

Well, definitely not all revisions, but for the patches instance of the
Guix Data Service I'm aiming to keep recent revisions.