Re: 04/09: gnu: mesa: Update to 23.0.3.

[Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1276 bytes --]


guix-commits@gnu.org writes:

> apteryx pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository guix.
>
> commit 0be7838105806819f4586ec9130382a66a22880e
> Author: Kaelyn Takata <kaelyn.alexi@protonmail.com>
> AuthorDate: Thu May 4 20:12:46 2023 +0000
>
>     gnu: mesa: Update to 23.0.3.
>
>     * gnu/packages/gl.scm (mesa): Update to 23.0.3.
>     [source]: Remove obsolete patch and update HTTPS url.
>     [arguments]: Enable the crocus gallium driver.
>     * gnu/packages/patches/mesa-fix-sporadic-test-failures.patch: Delete file.
>     * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Remove it.
> ---
>  gnu/local.mk                                       |  1 -
>  gnu/packages/gl.scm                                | 14 ++++-------
>  .../patches/mesa-fix-sporadic-test-failures.patch  | 27 ----------------------
>  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

→ guix refresh -l mesa
Building the following 1954 packages would ensure 4257 dependent
packages are rebuilt ...


I know there's been some discussion about changing processes regarding
changes like this that impact lots of packages, but as far as I'm aware,
the documented process hasn't changed yet. So should this have gone to
core-updates, and not been directly pushed to master?

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 987 bytes --]