From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:306:2d92::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id qOaMINxh/2TqgAAA9RJhRA:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 20:52:12 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:306:2d92::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id qOaMINxh/2TqgAAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 20:52:12 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EE113D52D for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 20:52:12 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20221208 header.b=rJ2fAIHT; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1694458332; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=UiJGzofMlOOU02k/GfdNJJbe1ElsaQeW81RHmyc4DcDPOEktzT9GSVRailhfR1bTX9FOoF pHsUSLNfWBCj/nkW0eU9eoFWl/PLA9OTjK/pT+irVUqgQ0HmBEqRvq+635ESsfnG8k7bUL 48tJnf1tpXh+BNY7Wog34MyqHj/O2Y10jkYGRhLl0a+VEsHAXLpdeNuVbmjAsrJXq0oFXe Pl+/aDVfixHB0v506hZ13QkIH9sSAasVz4UlwkPVBcKwJwWrKkSBuAnktpSl+w89iiVrRm qE99GHIMuhmqx/BQY0ytLZZRGtdsL5ToVz0IWH4VRd4aTKSxAHbbHzrsOmlF9Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1694458332; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=giO2iEVkamh+SFEXZAbCbUIrc+d1Udz+ZQzErc0htK4=; b=iFkXIer1E9vtC0RGBCiVgTk1UKO3cYDb30kCzmqOGh8n9xZY4Bz6Uip9FE9ixs4Wltrbxp HkM32253FIk9R3BN0LOG4wZ2D/51g8SaHTYH9idwseuQ833aEURfKwpalvFZl9swF/sev3 in8l/LcLHkBy96+lwfaNfnQYZ7mQlQ3uQf3QuKkQoapWNKd4ZS4Msql2UJt49j3V6lW8Y/ ooQU3yxD+nr/FyHp8cWPQLlJQ9V/H6HGnQkJh7OibSvhTpfqYGRqH+6YL8Qd/2eyPAhEJ/ fSpd0zkSbWdd6QRHo2/3J1vJXZiEVzeC7Pqq2GdDdevc9zpo+V1upNHT4nBTng== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20221208 header.b=rJ2fAIHT; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qfm0s-0001Jt-GT; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 14:51:58 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qfm0i-0001Hp-HP for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 14:51:48 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x433.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::433]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qfm0e-00032k-6X for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 14:51:48 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-x433.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-31f2ab21231so741957f8f.0 for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 11:51:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1694458302; x=1695063102; darn=gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=giO2iEVkamh+SFEXZAbCbUIrc+d1Udz+ZQzErc0htK4=; b=rJ2fAIHTUbIPOSIA5Xr7xWb3ZnJXJseJTYaEGppo5CKrLi1n762zw1PTNGwU/FAWvY J8b9mQDCEf0mjIej4UXcymcgrwEWMNMmLXKlgRpl1Ix5SRZJTzR1q+7Q2b7vJtTqoR8x wFRSE24Hz7V4qc7f/LUoIjLNdvOrFVvkZ0V1zkBYSCHVbCIQpDiozXoplUycgy+QssGE PbHcyX2DmYWdt0zYQMSp+dQY6RNxWItoY6PLhNm3VWqugHva+cnoerZ/v2gpfQ1lMnfZ QIlNC8bJfv9Qx+e8Tl10P6TOHmkf3XCsH3IuRNyDLv1Eqndl7E87pWGKURBr5KAXWkR5 XkjQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1694458302; x=1695063102; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=giO2iEVkamh+SFEXZAbCbUIrc+d1Udz+ZQzErc0htK4=; b=YUAasYg9WF5diYqxdVe3ijG44U8RGH0Wl8NIFwf83w9iwSQrvcqHPKJUQhbcLzLWSL zFCvvWhHYqpiX3RuEP0Yzngu4lH9KtADCkNK+tFt+yZ+PKnALOVwyphdwAF2sTQnduLv 28McxFL/je3G1dSOGAjmmVpNRx+QHqHn28kyVDSmz+j8MH32BXNH/IVkSZ+PV+Q83cni QdhHDW/t0TRThGIzCP0mcxJJLIB73TR19wq26nt9QUZJEoJknvM8vm2hppe4Y1+rZm8v VDvQARzBgbgxIaUsQKb82AIxqADQEOEUECbTz8bByEGvR+yHiYbHHDBEFUNMbZq03jxv oMpA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywf2XyIoAV3QXw7N8xTR1lK1zY7WjB/qhQi5tM7di+E/NdEu+XG 8PoUELTNvUJ4B1ILLNBQNJ5D5DIiEu4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEuLpBV+Hdo/tXCZDpDneJwxAKJaNahUH2pls5MilPwkQUxtu8/fAs0n+zaUFbALL6WY3ESrA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:136f:b0:317:73e3:cf41 with SMTP id q15-20020a056000136f00b0031773e3cf41mr7686107wrz.1.1694458302058; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 11:51:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pfiuh07 ([193.48.40.241]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n7-20020a5d67c7000000b0031423a8f4f7sm10845381wrw.56.2023.09.11.11.51.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 11 Sep 2023 11:51:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Simon Tournier To: Liliana Marie Prikler , Ricardo Wurmus Cc: Attila Lendvai , Andreas Enge , Katherine Cox-Buday , guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors? In-Reply-To: <07680e309df1fe42da11d9e3a6c33de40f82bf09.camel@gmail.com> References: <87sf7o67ia.fsf@elephly.net> <9269133a74e06bfc5ee5bfeee0342ba2f5beaeb1.camel@gmail.com> <87tts44d2y.fsf@elephly.net> <4c85b742e29ebbf7fe3cde3f72961269ec26218c.camel@gmail.com> <87cyyr3zdc.fsf@elephly.net> <87fs3lj8tn.fsf@gmail.com> <07680e309df1fe42da11d9e3a6c33de40f82bf09.camel@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 20:50:52 +0200 Message-ID: <87r0n4fss3.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::433; envelope-from=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x433.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -7.06 X-Spam-Score: -7.06 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 4EE113D52D X-Migadu-Scanner: mx2.migadu.com X-TUID: ttELQ0ffJfD/ Hi Liliana, On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 at 19:53, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: > For "patch does not apply", the forge solution is typically to send a > notification to the issuer. No, that does not match my small experience. Because often the issuer is gone or not responding. As a reviewer using the forge solution, I am still able to pull the issuer branch and then resolve the conflicts if any. Using =E2=80=9Cour=E2=80=9D workflow, I fail earlier in the process. I am = not able to apply the patches against any branches (pull the PR somehow). An example: [bug#62202] [PATCH 0/21] Juliahub import script. https://issues.guix.gnu.org/msgid/871qlq89kz.fsf@ngraves.fr Even before looking at it, I have to spend some time to find a way to manually apply the patches. Then, rebasing on the top of master could lead to conflict but that another story and the same appears whatever the workflow. Nicolas did a cool job with this Julia importer, and because of this first boring task, I am procrastinating and delaying to the eternal tomorrow the review of the work. Whatever the complexity of this task, there is no value for the project. I read Ricardo=E2=80=99s message [1] as: our workflow is far to help us for having smooth reviews so it=E2=80=99s hard to convince folks already famili= ar with other workflows to adopt our. Not saying that these other workflows are better either. Cheers, simon 1: Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors? Ricardo Wurmus Fri, 08 Sep 2023 22:24:06 +0200 id:87tts44d2y.fsf@elephly.net https://yhetil.org/guix/87tts44d2y.fsf@elephly.net https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2023-09