[PATCH 1/2] licenses: Add 'silofl1.1'.

[Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 192 bytes --]

The license for the Liberation fonts.  I named it ‘silofl1.1’ or should
it be just ‘silofl’?  Also about the title: "SIL Open Font License 1.1"
or "SILOFL 1.1" or something else?


[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-licenses-Add-silofl1.1.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1080 bytes --]

From ef66e2f801d5b54bb16074bea747888e6ed4e5be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 09:38:04 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] licenses: Add 'silofl1.1'.

* guix/licenses.scm (silofl1.1): New variable.
---
 guix/licenses.scm | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/guix/licenses.scm b/guix/licenses.scm
index 8b7ea53..3f1e8b0 100644
--- a/guix/licenses.scm
+++ b/guix/licenses.scm
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
             psfl public-domain
             qpl
             ruby
+            silofl1.1
             vim
             x11 x11-style
             zlib
@@ -267,6 +268,11 @@ which may be a file:// URI pointing the package's tree."
            "http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:Ruby"
            "https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/about/license.txt"))
 
+(define silofl1.1
+  (license "SIL Open Font License 1.1"
+           "http://scripts.sil.org/OFL_web"
+           "https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list#SILOFL"))
+
 (define vim
   (license "Vim"
            "http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:Vim7.2"
-- 
2.1.2