From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Invalid nar signature Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 18:19:08 +0100 Message-ID: <87ppbkompf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zjapejo3.fsf@izanagi.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43420) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0ZIo-0005RK-9i for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 12:19:31 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0ZIe-0003n0-7I for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 12:19:22 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a01:474::1]:48966) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0ZIe-0003md-0n for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 12:19:12 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87zjapejo3.fsf@izanagi.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> (David Thompson's message of "Sun, 14 Dec 2014 21:22:36 -0500") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: David Thompson Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org I think this is due to a subtly misleading file format variation. If you look at =E2=80=98export-paths=E2=80=99, it does: while there are files to write write-long-long 1 export-path file write-long-long 0 =E2=80=98restore-file-set=E2=80=99 does the opposite, which is to read that= long-long to determine whether there=E2=80=99s data coming up, and then to call =E2=80=98restore-file=E2=80=99. HTH! Ludo=E2=80=99.