From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: gnu: Add STAR.
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 13:51:42 +0100
Message-ID: <87pp9i7wv5.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <idjk2zr6tai.fsf@bimsb-sys02.mdc-berlin.net>
	<87twyu7kee.fsf@gnu.org> <idjbnl26r5m.fsf@bimsb-sys02.mdc-berlin.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58001)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1YLAI9-0003Ug-Ub
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 07:51:50 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1YLAI4-0008OJ-S5
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 07:51:49 -0500
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:54740)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1YLAI4-0008OF-PA
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 07:51:44 -0500
In-Reply-To: <idjbnl26r5m.fsf@bimsb-sys02.mdc-berlin.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's
	message of "Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:40:21 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>
Cc: Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de> skribis:

> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes:
>>> +    (license license:gpl3)))
>>
>> GPLv3-only?
>
> Actually, searching the source tree shows me that LICENSE includes the
> "or (at your option) any later version" phrase; but the included copy of
> htslib that is built as part of the STAR aligner is MIT licensed.
>
> I'll update the license field to
>
>   ;; STAR is licensed under GPLv3 or later; htslib is MIT-licensed.
>   (license (list license:gpl3+ license:expat))
>
> Is this appropriate?

Since the combined work is GPLv3+ anyway, I would keep the comment but
set the =E2=80=98license=E2=80=99 field to GPL3+.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.