From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Various Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 15:12:46 +0200 Message-ID: <87pp7s0wxd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87sicx2qqz.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> <87384t2v40.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> <87k2y5t465.fsf@gnu.org> <87lhik27kt.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> <87twx8iz8i.fsf@gnu.org> <878uek22o5.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> <87r3scdjcz.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3sbh3nc.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> <87d23vsbyy.fsf@gnu.org> <87mw2zh32l.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> <877fu1gvb9.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40634) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YcD1I-00042t-72 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 09:12:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YcD1E-0001sX-VD for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 09:12:52 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:53757) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YcD1E-0001sR-S9 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 09:12:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <877fu1gvb9.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> ("Taylan Ulrich \=\?utf-8\?Q\?\=5C\=22Bay\=C4\=B1rl\=C4\=B1\=2FKammer\=5C\=22\=22's\?\= message of "Sat, 28 Mar 2015 13:28:42 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Taylan Ulrich =?utf-8?Q?=22Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1?= =?utf-8?Q?=2FKammer=22?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kammer") skribis: > taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kammer") writes: > >> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: >> >>> (set-file-time "config/config.h.in" (stat "config/config.h")) >> >> There's no "config/config.h", even after the configure phase. Is it >> fine to use (stat "configure") instead? > > I went forth and pushed this (along with the others). OK, thanks! Ludo=E2=80=99.