From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Kost Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add mpv-minimal. Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2015 21:49:53 +0300 Message-ID: <87poykbui6.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87d1um2o3f.fsf@gmail.com> <20151204171327.GD6556@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52377) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a5Hu9-00056O-6A for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 13:49:58 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a5Hu6-0002Pr-0R for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 13:49:57 -0500 Received: from mail-lf0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::22d]:35597) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a5Hu5-0002Pn-PK for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 13:49:53 -0500 Received: by lfdl133 with SMTP id l133so130093141lfd.2 for ; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 10:49:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20151204171327.GD6556@debian> (Andreas Enge's message of "Fri, 4 Dec 2015 18:13:27 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Andreas Enge (2015-12-04 20:13 +0300) wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 07:08:36PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote: >> I cry every time I see samba during updating my profile, so I wonder if >> it is acceptable to have "mpv-minimal" which is less heavy on >> dependencies. If so, perhaps the other people have ideas what inputs >> may also be removed, thanks. > > Or would it make sense to remove samba altogether from the regular mpv > package? I'm personally for it, but there may be users who need mpv with samba support, so I'm not sure if it is right. I thought that default Guix packages should be full-featured, no? -- Alex