unofficial mirror of guix-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: rain1@openmailbox.org
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: About collision encountered arbitrarily choosing ...
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 23:30:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87poufwqw0.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ee55d4982e86aa7cd1b62562dedebee6@openmailbox.org> (rain1@openmailbox.org's message of "Sun, 27 Mar 2016 19:58:15 +0100")

rain1@openmailbox.org skribis:

> A bad package could sneakily replace a core system library with, for
> example, insecure crypto code. So I think it is something that should
> be dealt with.

That’s really out of the threat model.  The problem here is the
installation of an evil package in the first place, not the shadowing.

> I had a look at past discussions on this:
>
> * https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-05/msg00437.html
> * https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-12/msg00106.html
> * https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-09/msg00213.html
> * https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-07/msg00668.html
>
> one idea was a whitelist to reduce the amount of errors displayed.
>
> I've made a list of the collisions I see on my system:
>
> * [gnome] /share/icons/hicolor/icon-theme.cache
> * [gnome] /lib/gio/modules/giomodule.cache
> * [gnome] /share/glib-2.0/schemas/gschemas.compiled
> * [gnome] /bin/gtk-update-icon-cache # because there are 2 versions of
> gtk
> * [python] /bin/coverage
> * [python] /bin/.coverage3-wrap-01
> * [python] /bin/py.test-3.4
> * [python] /bin/.py.test-wrap-01
> * [python] /bin/.py.test-3.4-wrap-01
>
> A suggestion I have for helping reduce this is there could be a post
> install phase in gtk build system to delete those specific .cache
> files. There could also be a similar one in those python libraries.
>
> Do people agree that this is a potential problem? If so I could
> attempt to add such an phase. Or maybe there are other solutions that
> would solve this better?

These warnings are definitely a problem, but they’re a user interface
problem.

For GNOME/GLib cache files, I think the solution may be to generate them
at profile-creation time.

I’ve never seen the pytest collisions before, so I can’t tell.

Ricardo also suggested that ‘guix package’ should warn about or error
out when propagated inputs conflict with each other, or conflict with
explicitly-installed packages.  I think we should do that.

Ludo’.

      reply	other threads:[~2016-03-27 21:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-27 18:58 About collision encountered arbitrarily choosing rain1
2016-03-27 21:30 ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87poufwqw0.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=ludo@gnu.org \
    --cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=rain1@openmailbox.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).