From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] build: Move included files to subdirectories.
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2016 00:54:22 +0200
Message-ID: <87potpdv1d.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <1459700326-30016-1-git-send-email-mthl@gnu.org>
	<1459700326-30016-2-git-send-email-mthl@gnu.org>
	<20160403213616.52b60218@openmailbox.org> <87shyohymg.fsf@gnu.org>
	<8737qnx0jm.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43366)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1arZ6l-00054d-Km
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 18:54:32 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1arZ6k-0004Up-OL
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 18:54:31 -0400
In-Reply-To: <8737qnx0jm.fsf@gnu.org> (Mathieu Lirzin's message of "Fri, 15
	Apr 2016 00:55:57 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@gnu.org> skribis:

> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes:
>
>> Eric Bavier <ericbavier@openmailbox.org> skribis:
>>>
>>> I don't prefer the "local.mk" convention.  It becomes
>>> non-obvious that the file is input for Automake, and the name loses any
>>> descriptive power.
>>
>> I have mixed feelings (notably because file names in those .mk files
>> remain relative to $top_srcdir, which can be confusing and will make M-/
>> useless).
>
> I didn't know about M-/ :)
>
> To emphasize how the file names relate to the current directory of the
> =E2=80=98Makefile=E2=80=99 snippet, we could use =E2=80=98%reldir%=E2=80=
=99 or =E2=80=98%D%=E2=80=99 like describe in:
>
>   https://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/automake.html#Include
>
> Moreover this would makes the future move/rename of directories less
> troublesome.
>
> WDYT?

Hey, didn=E2=80=99t know about that one!  :-)

So yes, %D%, why not?

Ludo=E2=80=99.