Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:

> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:02:21PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> just a quick comment on the name:
>> 
>> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 02:47:55PM -0500, Lukas Gradl wrote:
>> > Upstream seems to refer to the software as "iax" "libiax" and "libiax2"
>> > interchangeably.  The "2" was the closest thing I could find to a version
>> > number.
>> 
>> notice that the tarball name is always "correct" as the package name, unless
>> upstream consistently uses a different name. In this case:
>> 
>> +           "https://gitlab.savoirfairelinux.com/sflphone/libiax2/"
>> +           "repository/archive.tar.gz?ref="
>> 
>> I would suggest to use "libiax2" as the package name (variable name and
>> package NAME field), and the version number as proposed by Leo.
>
> Okay, so let's change the naming to libiax2, and give some more detail
> about the licensing, as shown in my patch from earlier today. Then we
> should be ready to merge :)


OK, I changed the name to libiax2 and added the license field + comment
from your patch.

A big Thank you to everyone for their input!  I still feel fairly unsure
about what I am doing, so I really appreciate that!

Best,
Lukas