From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ui: 'package->recutils' serializes the source field.
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 11:22:27 +0300
Message-ID: <87popegzwc.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <CAOFm3uHFc+EF=zJ1PS-oPjdZxsAA=4EUN_uvTPgYfG2CgcDTkA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAL1_imnYuTu7bT=yKyCfKP5ud2VF3m3HHuT3bTOzV4=8j3ehPw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87vazcce0a.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAL1_im=zUwVSU6dQ7WkzYozoBEBbZLAp_njrP-gT1DQ6eACmqg@mail.gmail.com>
	<87r39zcfkz.fsf@gnu.org> <871t1zoz98.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87invbc6hn.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAL1_im=96LRQipqa31PzOc79pAHxG7fYO1Q0vDytNxgp7f1qBg@mail.gmail.com>
	<87ziombyrx.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAL1_immTf49VOT5czhgN4ffzrm5GiTAyZXeqc5eCdJP29y-ANg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAL1_im=-7v9H7dSfMYSgkb9sVj8AzOGPfhLwtzquajAWU+udTw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87popglv3u.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAL1_imm4fXxErjsgDhd92Jnj7=nXvRxjXRaVBTftL_3JdenZNQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87lh04ltg2.fsf@gnu.org>
	<32ade0cc-b971-a3fa-ea92-9b313955a373@uq.edu.au>
	<CAL1_im=xCMu-gvabBMBOvqw01TabUmUPEZAKrT9Q62uYcMGorg@mail.gmail.com>
	<4e35f009-ba71-f430-65e6-e986365b0c77@uq.edu.au>
	<87twesd9jw.fsf@elephly.net>
	<CAL1_immboQe+fGnADFaCoR4QsgtsYNE4MifkXoNrkmj20eQ7Xg@mail.gmail.com>
	<87k2fnz7zl.fsf@gmail.com>
	<CAL1_im=R4KZtYNSjcuupZ+v5SGX3V3yYc39VM18U1JDvYG9NPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54636)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1bYEmg-0003Yi-Q2
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 11:54:11 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1bYEma-0004ct-UT
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 11:54:09 -0400
Received: from mail-wm0-x233.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::233]:35210)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1bYEma-0004ce-NC
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 11:54:04 -0400
Received: by mail-wm0-x233.google.com with SMTP id f65so35217057wmi.0
	for <guix-devel@gnu.org>; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 08:54:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAL1_im=R4KZtYNSjcuupZ+v5SGX3V3yYc39VM18U1JDvYG9NPQ@mail.gmail.com>
	(David Craven's message of "Thu, 11 Aug 2016 18:19:30 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: David Craven <david@craven.ch>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

David Craven (2016-08-11 19:19 +0300) wrote:

> How invested are you in this patch? I decided that I wasn't that
> invested and it isn't worth the trouble. Some things are not meant to
> be.

Invested?  Sorry, I don't understand.  Do you mean how much I need this
patch?  Well, I don't need it at all, since I never use "guix package
--show".  I just don't see a problem in accepting this patch as I don't
understand Mathieu's and Mark's concerns about FSDG compliance, but I'm
not competent in this area, so I let other people judge.

-- 
Alex