From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kei Kebreau Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add telepathy-idle. Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 15:14:35 -0400 Message-ID: <87pooq9ihw.fsf@openmailbox.org> References: <87zinv8qx3.fsf@openmailbox.org> <20160830050353.GA25917@jasmine> <87vayi8j9g.fsf@openmailbox.org> <20160830175350.GC30380@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53384) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1beoUp-0007Gy-8m for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 15:14:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1beoUl-00011V-2I for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 15:14:55 -0400 Received: from smtp8.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.42]:57045) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1beoUk-00011G-Rb for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 15:14:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160830175350.GC30380@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Tue, 30 Aug 2016 13:53:50 -0400") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Leo Famulari writes: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 09:43:23AM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote: >> Leo Famulari writes: >> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:45:44PM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote: >> >> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add telepathy-idle. * >> >> gnu/packages/freedesktop.scm (telepathy-idle): New variable. >> > >> >> + (version "0.2.0") >> > >> > Looks good, but why use this release when there appears to be >> > a newer version, 0.99.11? >> > >> > https://telepathy.freedesktop.org/releases/telepathy-idle/ >> I'm under the impression that those are unstable versions, >> hence the sudden jump in version number. Parabola >> GNU/Linux-libre packages this version, so I thought it would be >> safe. > > Can you ask the upstream developers? Or poke around in their > public communications to find some statement about this? 2016-08-30 15:00 Hello all! Visitor from #guix here. 2016-08-30 15:01 For clarity's sake, the latest stable version of telepathy-idle is 0.2.0, yes? 2016-08-30 15:02 I would assume that the 0.99.x versions are unstable or development versions. 2016-08-30 15:10 Indeed We're in the clear! :-) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXxdsbAAoJEOal7jwZRnoNcEMQAK9dNtwczUihF+vD73KsIJQA fxmc1EPwd4U1FWOPWduHIUyBot3BOA2yzSMEwaHUWxhv6A9Q6VGbG/nBI1v7CoZD a+6/feQZFa2vqW6dHT48xG1xAqoieqF7EvJXePPZty0z9ltSfM6+U6VNyvengZQM ljkvcG/x7ycJvJRAm4lu6Tmh8q4Uu8/LB14tLBxadkKgMiCbsOweCDeZ2Gbfw43N RDKauJhRbLtygwp9jie+024wvSWX0Imvum5BQIq4hM56gQoJgYoc1ZeGb4bDAmYn J8NK4LpJaaKW12/cMV8t6yMjxqAM0Z3mp8D/rVd2uKobmgYQtdjXWljOjpk5DuIo 8guwmGGHXEbQ0MZZ/zFMb4zFXbJhGTQ6TBeXoRGxNwAq9pJpW4AywsAkR9tTODbX vw2hAmFMmYcareRwAP5kpFmkVpmrqZcIU29dFbkto27B0uOLPH9O+hthG/JZIMGR JdMhp7igBUXn5x8OgAdHqF323swCj4rVsadm6aWg40B3J+XTUbjgTf1Lvi569EZW MBujeSDLxWiRLkMnR6rPXRM+g67qcr/I8KTEeh+XCpzsFR7bzA2I5hxirIjR00nG woTs2Y6s7yP1w48facb6fSCv2hxev7cvGUyCLIFhGYXe+JrHsmtVMkyIVCW8Pd26 52/MFjRcMjkV3YggWObG =px0p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--