From: Dave Love <fx@gnu.org>
To: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: missing licence files and incomplete licence lists
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 23:21:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87poavh82x.fsf@albion.it.manchester.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k216467z.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?iso-8859-1\?Q\?Court\=E8s\?\= \=\?iso-8859-1\?Q\?\=22's\?\= message of "Sun, 10 Sep 2017 23:02:56 +0200")
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
> If you look at <https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Libc#Details>, you’ll see
> “License:LGPL”, which is already more vague than what we have (following
> FSF legal advice?). If you look at GitHub repos (yack!), Pypi, CPAN,
> Hackage, npm (doh!), well, that’s yet another level.
Yes, but... To package something for Debian or Fedora with a
problematic (or missing) licensing, you have to resolve that, typically
with "upstream", too get it into the distribution.
> I’m interested in concrete proposals to improve the situation that take
> into account the bigger picture as well as scalability considerations.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Ludo’.
I'd say consult FSF legal eagles initially, and see whether you can
piggy-back off the work the other distributions have done. Once you
have the legal constraints, you can consider a concrete proposal. I
think the package license field also needs generalizing somehow to allow
conjunctions and disjunctions. I fully realize the pain of all this
from experience...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-12 22:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-23 13:13 missing licence files and incomplete licence lists Dave Love
2017-09-04 14:36 ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-09-07 16:32 ` Dave Love
2017-09-10 21:02 ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-09-12 22:21 ` Dave Love [this message]
2017-09-21 14:23 ` Ricardo Wurmus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87poavh82x.fsf@albion.it.manchester.ac.uk \
--to=fx@gnu.org \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=ludo@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).