From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Successfully running GNOME on core-updates + staging Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 14:14:04 +0200 Message-ID: <87po2ntreb.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8736zp571h.fsf@netris.org> <871sf7hv7o.fsf@gnu.org> <877eoxaj01.fsf@fastmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47186) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fBJJp-0003O4-4F for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 08:14:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fBJJl-00021T-N2 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 08:14:41 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:43002) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fBJJl-000213-Gf for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 08:14:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <877eoxaj01.fsf@fastmail.com> (Marius Bakke's message of "Mon, 23 Apr 2018 20:13:34 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Marius Bakke Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hello, Marius Bakke skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > >> Hi Mark, >> >> Mark H Weaver skribis: >> >>> I've successfully updated my x86_64 GuixSD system to my private branch >>> based on 'core-updates' with recent 'master' and 'staging' merged into >>> it. This system includes a full GNOME desktop environment plus a few >>> programs based on Qt. It all works quite well. >>> >>> My branch includes a few draft fixes and workarounds that I haven't yet >>> pushed, but nothing that would require many rebuilds to update later. >>> >>> So, I think it might be time to ask Hydra to build all of core-updates, >>> after staging is merged into it. >> >> I agree. There was an issue with cross-compiling =E2=80=98bootstrap-tar= balls=E2=80=99 >> that Marius reported a few days ago, which I=E2=80=99m looking into righ= t now. >> I don=E2=80=99t expect the fix(es) to trigger a full rebuild. >> >> If Marius and others don=E2=80=99t object, I=E2=80=99d say go for it! > > No objections from me. However I do have a bunch of fairly innocent > updates in my queue, such as SQLite, Glib and CMake. It's also tempting > to get rid of that Perl graft. Is it too late for such changes? I think it=E2=80=99s OK for sqlite/glib/cmake, but changing Perl would furt= her delay things, which perhaps is not desirable. > Hydra will be busy for a couple of days with 'master' and 'staging', so > there's little use in starting it immediately. It took me a couple of days to reply :-), so maybe we can start the evaluation now? We can also get berlin to build all of =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99 if we= want. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.