From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pierre Neidhardt Subject: Re: Blog: Guix packaging tutorial Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2018 00:09:22 +0200 Message-ID: <87pnwk9jl9.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> References: <87in397jsd.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20180913191151.GA1865@jurong> <87woro5ocf.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20180914113302.elqrk3tvdkln2cde@thebird.nl> <87o9cmj0fc.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87mus6iypf.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87zhw02ea9.fsf@mdc-berlin.de> <87o9cex112.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87efdau5x2.fsf@gnu.org> <87murywuvn.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87lg7go8cv.fsf@gnu.org> <87va6kuyk4.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87sh1ot9m5.fsf@elephly.net> <87bm8bv4ao.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <874le2j3ox.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87o9c4qxek.fsf@elephly.net> <87sh1g9t74.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87in2cqkf9.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43008) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g9diX-0003eh-1s for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2018 18:09:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g9diV-0002Hk-VT for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2018 18:09:33 -0400 In-reply-to: <87in2cqkf9.fsf@elephly.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel , guix-blog@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > I assumed we would just build the package, not build and install. When > packaging something, the common thing to do is to build, change, build > again, =E2=80=A6 and in the end maybe install (or submit to the mailing l= ist). Maybe you are right. I'll see if I can adjust this. > Finally, I think the conclusion is a bit anti-climatic :) I feel like > it misses a sentence after presenting the outlook to the future; maybe > an announcement of a follow-up blog post? Or encouragement to get > started packaging today? I don't want to announce a follow-up blog post because I'm very busy at the moment and I don't want to promise something I'm not sure I can offer. That said, you are right, I forget to edit the conclusion and it feels unfinished. I'll work on it. =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAlu71ZIACgkQm9z0l6S7 zH8t9AgAh8U3poa45vV5YAPp6zqLxHoDFNunwlsVagABqSMJDthebvxlQIGqr3CJ IrBk8YEdu+sbJS3DaweBb80Y28T49bXH8r3QYH5E6QtDH4CdAAtgYMEj9rYGKQMm F23ZfSusJNmxIxT2cFpzRcjB/M+XkRkZvS+ezeOWJFlocN99RS8b1S28LcXQVsmz vIEMtWVrooZCFF28K9kVWVW0dlE9W5q+dEnLOmMJxpVcyVUF9jpjTLU0vV+qE1Yy 5cc81AdnpikTLLMp5eYPCnZ4f9fghp0R5sLlrH0FxNYQZclGvh/ujyJz2Y4l5zgd dkBATZx/FtUOojcV1pJ2w01vI7qPhw== =SptU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--