From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: Bioconductor package flowPeaks license Artistic 1.0? Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 23:15:55 +0200 Message-ID: <87pnlz9lro.fsf@elephly.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58950) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hqOcH-0001J1-Bv for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 17:16:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hqOcG-0003LD-9h for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 17:16:05 -0400 Received: from sender4-of-o53.zoho.com ([136.143.188.53]:21355) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hqOcF-0003KB-US for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 17:16:04 -0400 In-reply-to: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: zimon.toutoune@gmail.com Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org zimoun writes: > I am packaging bunch of Flow Cytometry packages and `flowPeaks` says > Artistic 1.0 license. > See https://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/manuals/flowPeaks/= man/flowPeaks.pdf > > And in `license.scm` there is only the 2.0. That=E2=80=99s because version 1.0 is considered non-free. =E2=80=9Clicens= es.scm=E2=80=9D also contains =E2=80=9Cclarified-artistic=E2=80=9D, which is essentially the sam= e as version 1.0 but with a few clarifications of those points that could be interpreted as conditions making the software non-free. --=20 Ricardo