From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marius Bakke Subject: Re: 'core-updates' Q4 2019 Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 20:17:39 +0200 Message-ID: <87pnimuhx8.fsf@devup.no> References: <87sgo252cq.fsf@devup.no> <878sprf1zk.fsf@posteo.net> <87ftjxd30v.fsf@gnu.org> <874l0ag5kv.fsf@posteo.net> <87tv8a0x8u.fsf@devup.no> <87v9snnlto.fsf@posteo.net> <87wod02714.fsf@ngyro.com> <87o8ycgkma.fsf@posteo.net> <20191021135850.qdplpdwap5nm6aoi@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87imoh7gz2.fsf@ngyro.com> <87a79sdusl.fsf@ngyro.com> <87lftbwdvg.fsf@devup.no> <875zkerj5e.fsf@ngyro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48070) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iNhg7-0005kI-Nk for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 14:17:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iNhg6-0002Jl-3p for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 14:17:43 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:54521) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iNhg5-0002JX-Ve for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 14:17:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: <875zkerj5e.fsf@ngyro.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Timothy Sample Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Timothy Sample writes: > Hi Marius, > > Marius Bakke writes: > >> Timothy Sample writes: >> >>> [1] It=E2=80=99s not obvious, but if you edit the GDM configuration file >>> generation code in =E2=80=9Cgnu/services/xorg.scm=E2=80=9D, you can ena= ble debug output >>> for GDM. The debug output is usually extremely helpful! >> >> Could that be exposed as a toggle in the service configuration? > > Indeed! It=E2=80=99s been on my list for ages. Thanks for the nudge. ;) Cool! Glad to be of service. :-) > How about the attached patch? I can confirm that it works, but would > like a second opinion on the name, since it is annoying to change later. LGTM. It needs a corresponding entry in doc/guix.texi though. Thank you! --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAl2x6sMACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPpgOgf+M/cMmv7XPVBcEggKW6HM8Tkf3n3SNgibDPof1rHWQPW/VKwuHPRI2yfO yiCjlQZDlT4AyNT32Z2zkgiuSamyUFzLLHLg+vRuYxs0TMvYkLTY+dGVS5rpvLAy Q8xIhuhSvXucIjw5UtW81NgzDooyZHySbeyJ1sEz7thb3FHGrdAntKSkpGYOw2aV AMdqg5oAfKMZi6wFb1VfKzwMhTBK21zxxczs40yj+0sLNyZFidy3lVAEmzPXIwyM aIvk0uelj6u6g3JnJp/m9QX0xpFd/B/ETkSRE/DdVY9zpsBc4zp4uLc+DTDxZZwe +4UbVm2xk9N9SBbh6wviLaYLtbMNWw== =HRMF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--