From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id wK3+C2koNV/EKQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 11:47:53 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id gKPUB2koNV/0OgAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 11:47:53 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A80BA940142 for ; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 11:47:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:60708 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k6Bi3-0008M1-Fp for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 07:47:51 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37836) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k6Bht-0008Lv-QL for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 07:47:41 -0400 Received: from sender4-of-o51.zoho.com ([136.143.188.51]:21135) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k6Bhr-0007J3-TZ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 07:47:41 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1597319255; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=aGDppaXJPkE6YpEfsP1ygObJQLnPdLECWNwxX1c/3oc+lCveYY36f8dNDrRTGpEPtqxZKIiRB1DeQ68E8gqQ/Di8shZbNmng1xTSXVdXz1pdtZ8xE+BDOKMt6w0moOh/vtF8zfnHxYCW/B8jxjvtN92odHPfHAzPdN8iAjJFnpQ= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1597319255; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To; bh=oxnE1KsUMGSfV3NO4X1dZ6ImNBHCR/mXZGCSej9AEiU=; b=gEYSFaGYYNUJU+HEScZsmj6mrDrSOKJGLCFhY4SXSXQaMpXmbIw8aVcTsQlmI/IjRW5ZoQx3BMtbAA9LoCkMj9SJ3Kfjz5HHkqkspHysdyI7WQXddCgROZdm+PxoSd/5JSZg9NpLUIauGjC+GovOmsghYtiwPiJAStzX1MDRq1Y= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1597319255; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=oxnE1KsUMGSfV3NO4X1dZ6ImNBHCR/mXZGCSej9AEiU=; b=fJ/Mmtd8glF7+Z//FTGt1P+jdr0hBfjICOjVymgfnWJbWgPkSU06qVgEQa1wj1V4 4gytuYgNp1l+Ra7kShzOp8NAb8wqv4tosG31aqMmKKFEOjM0fjL2f1Z2vuBNUxdoEAn p7fE45wGR1Ga/mXUGxMjA+II4fITrAZmOs0IAcIc= Received: from localhost (p54ad45d2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.69.210]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 15973192489561013.7608878154546; Thu, 13 Aug 2020 04:47:28 -0700 (PDT) References: <87sgcuh8rb.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87y2ml429i.fsf@elephly.net> <87364tgja3.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87y2mlf4jw.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87pn7x3pyw.fsf@elephly.net> <87r1sbel4f.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87eeobh01d.fsf@systemreboot.net> <87d03uevdq.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.10; emacs 26.3 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: Pierre Neidhardt Subject: Re: File search progress: database review and question on triggers In-reply-to: <87d03uevdq.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 13:47:24 +0200 Message-ID: <87pn7u3gz7.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ZohoMailClient: External Received-SPF: pass client-ip=136.143.188.51; envelope-from=rekado@elephly.net; helo=sender4-of-o51.zoho.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/08/13 07:47:37 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -30 X-Spam_score: -3.1 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=elephly.net header.s=zoho header.b=fJ/Mmtd8; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.99 X-TUID: x2mO+dSsz/8m Pierre Neidhardt writes: > - Or do you think SQLite patterns (using "%") would do for now? As > Mathieu pointed out, it's an unfortunate inconsistency with the rest of > Guix. But maybe regexp support can be added in a second stage. These patterns could be generated from user input that looks more like what we already use elsewhere. We don=E2=80=99t have to directly pass the SQLite interface to users. --=20 Ricardo