From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 6PSpLdS5XF9DYAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 12:06:44 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id iLvzJ9S5XF/BPwAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 12:06:44 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBF3B9408DB for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 12:06:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:41586 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kH4Ik-0002Vs-Q1 for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 08:06:42 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59354) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kH4Ib-0002Vc-Tb for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 08:06:34 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:40813) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kH4IZ-0003tp-OF for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 08:06:33 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A0BE2400FD for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 14:06:28 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1599912388; bh=GTsPBU9f+FErL4boCq0mA2LJWcOc1gASLhA/dXC2m+A=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=hulMXUiV354GfBvFqLFF6Q6Zd4QybOTM5xSCaR+HGSW55SfZzJlBxyLtU1F3xiYJ1 lIvL+8pRpmh43ErToIS4ETe2Hw0VqeAkQH6RuCNH8XC0CtctmjpfdXSzH77z1kFqP+ p3zbo9K3vlSAE4koTkRaa3MQ4Yf1SOCSART/Q2cXGzeEKeEA2LIxsnd6TlwY1Zmhnw k+U0YSM6ioEZG0cR0gMSlwt3fNkuIPVCRodStEX6Cz1++IN0o2L+b+QlhqjJKx5tT2 nxH+pMJ2H2yJ5cSbD/d1CfGEBq93lJlD1G52aeb729sWKS6FO6y93PNGKL7BFotOLn S0etYY/ZJ5guA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4BpWYv41Qpz9rxn; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 14:06:26 +0200 (CEST) References: <87sgbntjz4.fsf@yamatai> <87blibcmuy.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87y2lfb67c.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1 From: Guillaume Le Vaillant To: Pierre Neidhardt Subject: Re: Improve ASDF build system for Common Lisp libraries In-reply-to: <87y2lfb67c.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 14:06:01 +0200 Message-ID: <87pn6rtd1y.fsf@yamatai> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=glv@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/12 08:06:29 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=hulMXUiV; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.31 X-TUID: ZsbLOFuldeMO --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Pierre Neidhardt skribis: > What do you think about the moving the SBCL / ECL definitions to package > outputs? I thought about having the sources, SBCL compiled files and ECL compiled files respectively in the 'out', 'sbcl' and 'ecl' packages outputs; however I thought there could be issues in some cases. For example, if a profile contained cl-xyz and cl-xyz:sbcl, and if the user tried to load this xyz system in ECL, then I think ECL would try to compile the system and write the compiled files to cl-xyz:sbcl and fail because it is read-only. That's because cl-xyz:sbcl contains the ASDF configuration indicating "the compiled files for cl-xyz are in cl-xyz:sbcl", and ECL is going to read that configuration. It might be possible to have smarter ASDF configuration files behaving differently depending on the lisp implementation running, but I have not investigated this for the moment. > About Osicat: There are grovel left overs that could be removed. > The former build system used to do that automatically. Maybe we can > restore this behaviour? The former build system deleted everything in 'lib/common-lisp/' except the bundle. We can't do that anymore because now the fasl files that we have to keep are in a directory tree whose structure we can't really predict. It depends how the sources are organized. Maybe we could just add a 'cleanup-left-overs' phase in the definition of the packages where some left-overs can be deleted. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEAREKAC0WIQTLxZxm7Ce5cXlAaz5r6CCK3yH+PwUCX1y5qQ8cZ2x2QHBvc3Rl by5uZXQACgkQa+ggit8h/j+KWQD6A22Dwe6V972YuJeW1BB7M03FDB10aVW55Itj kaqcFUAA/02pYgikm99moc0qht2L35vWpCrbc8860Llm9d530p2V =IJWo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--