From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id oHtjK0pWPWNU8gAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 05 Oct 2022 12:02:50 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id gGyXK0pWPWMSKAAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 05 Oct 2022 12:02:50 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FF8F279CD for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 12:02:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:35192 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1og1En-0000UR-PF for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2022 06:02:49 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52358) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1og1Dg-00085p-DL for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2022 06:01:41 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34996) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1og1Dg-00076L-3C; Wed, 05 Oct 2022 06:01:40 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To: From; bh=drXymKFLsVz9FbkPdp6VXeq0xjrOch06XkwyqFoKEag=; b=BPPzfs69JuALwdqnRg6p WuZpfkyGD8xtqc3vxIJ8AjTpgjhRpAcIvazLEmAUrBHnan41iilMb4egyYtu/f+uQAvOCFyqxie6G fKIdylp6q1cDObia9wasDSmST6DtzQeKbCTq0lEszIIX/OzzPSTPx5+88jjuqQBXFdA5J6Hh6Ymdk xeeGkp3dX/+L2QCKM453a6rJW8eHCCgCxkLt5Q2suoSiRWNq3cQZK5Z5wmp/WcJSE4sZAvFN5Ea40 WOLLQ6JE30i4PTzpBhGmr8kLxYBn63GrnW8iL3YVFKmrm7S4MNoVmsQF7r96X0S98qZ830fYJVmHL xT47vT4ztgj9qA==; Received: from 91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net ([91.160.117.201]:52345 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1og1DS-0008H0-Fm; Wed, 05 Oct 2022 06:01:38 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Christopher Baines Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: Progress with automating testing of patches References: <87mtbc3g5e.fsf@cbaines.net> <87sfkneqmm.fsf@cbaines.net> <878rlzec5e.fsf@gnu.org> <87y1tzjj15.fsf@cbaines.net> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: Quartidi 14 =?utf-8?Q?Vend=C3=A9miaire?= an 231 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution=2C?= jour du =?utf-8?B?UsOpc8OpZGE=?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2022 12:01:23 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87y1tzjj15.fsf@cbaines.net> (Christopher Baines's message of "Sat, 01 Oct 2022 22:58:09 +0100") Message-ID: <87pmf6si6k.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1664964170; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=drXymKFLsVz9FbkPdp6VXeq0xjrOch06XkwyqFoKEag=; b=uHXJGBNan413K92YzifKUJkshME4x2N3KXOzbHTqSG2pxeTGO+41CAEjmgvIqG2n5U6ire dOuD1q6H7Dbvlk8rBVRJVgwo8FDRsN9aerKhoSBTRMS3+w8ebwCWllgLoqURMrpxxyHZw2 YUs6Mx6oerbEaihggB3dyKBtx6pUttIZLdjUPrDWFPSFbhg65bsHSL9axOZaZrWq6Ohpj0 O3giAI7jMS+ura5LhXnfMc4kCubBdGiD7HxZIvLKALUmYFffUU/Yq06gWLSMolxUyYy14b 0Sh2eu/28Y18l9mvxa1HGO7dTz3iLzSzG/oZd2ckQlssx4jm2zNNNl3cYH06SA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1664964170; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=MifsTBF1azVV1nAYPInK8YG8iNGzLnv96r6eoElJZ1gkDDFrmGCHtQzntlLkbLqFV/dk0g 3Xpml79Bj6FRCZMlnq+WmCMm7kcZA3Mawzc/ig7JUcmS2u6YavfdycAwFauTzxu8T981nT wHaz5Desf9SEvxUmjXsjxulRAgP6+vQbWHxah3yEGletPpQ2286LQqfgH+kdJsPO4yRg+w S1NE0+Cc8+b3tqddF9JAULaljm5QaR27e+19MRsONcI5oxrxjA1Mvp2Y2CWZwnX6IP5ujb pZdu+Urvd6j8+oogFF507g42z3/OKpqqBX9mt0/aj36yOGfmuAFZC/000wlP8g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=BPPzfs69; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -7.86 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=BPPzfs69; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 8FF8F279CD X-Spam-Score: -7.86 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: NcN4IkMVxWsx Hi, Christopher Baines skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > >> I wonder if it=E2=80=99s due to recent changes since I last looked, but = I=E2=80=99m a >> bit confused by the numbers in this example: >> >> https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/58186 >> >> The numbers before/after patches don=E2=80=99t match and the lint warnin= gs (nice >> addition!) appear to unrelated to the patch at hand. >> >> Any idea what=E2=80=99s going on? > > I've had an initial look. One important clue is that the basis of the > comparison [1] differs between data.qa.guix.gnu.org and > data.guix.gnu.org [2]. The package number differs for example. > > 1: https://data.qa.guix.gnu.org/revision/e6777cfa5eb5e9c36eaf7810b42cac0f= bcaa367c > 2: https://data.guix.gnu.org/revision/e6777cfa5eb5e9c36eaf7810b42cac0fbca= a367c > > That shouldn't happen, one revision of Guix should have the same number > of packages regardless of what server looked at it. This being wrong > explains the bad data on qa.guix.gnu.org, since the comparison being > done by data.qa.guix.gnu.org is based on bad data. OK, I see. BTW, why do we have both data.qa.guix and data.guix? These are both instances of the same service, right? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.