From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Brasero, or gnome without gnome
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 23:48:22 +0200
Message-ID: <87ob77pcnt.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20131002124146.GA15506@debian> <524C7350.9080208@gmail.com>
	<20131002205308.GA1589@debian>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57554)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1VRUMM-0000Y0-83
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 17:53:35 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1VRUMG-0005pv-RB
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 17:53:30 -0400
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:51587)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1VRUMG-0005pr-LD
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 17:53:24 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20131002205308.GA1589@debian> (Andreas Enge's message of "Wed, 2
	Oct 2013 22:53:08 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:

> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 09:26:08PM +0200, Cyril Roelandt wrote:
>> Should this go in cdrom.scm or in gnome.scm ? How do we decide on
>> where we define GNOME programs ?
>
> We could decide that everything from mirror://gnome is a gnome program.
> Then brasero should go into gnome.scm.
>
> So far, there is also glib.scm and gtk.scm with bits and pieces from gnom=
e.
>
> On the other hand, I just put hicolor-icon-theme and icon-naming-utils
> into gnome.scm, although they are not part of gnome (but the first one is
> needed by brasero and supposedly most other gnome programs, and the second
> one is needed to compile gnome-icon-theme).
>
> A good scheme would be very welcome.
>
> One possibility would be a purely syntactical one: regroup everything from
> mirror://gnome into gnome.scm (which would become rather large, I suppose=
),
> and everything from freedesktop.org into a newly created freedesktop.scm.

This sounds like a simple approach, so probably a good one.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.