From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: 01/01: gnu: dbus-glib: Propagate inputs dbus and glib. Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 15:17:33 +0200 Message-ID: <87oal83ifm.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20150523153249.19884.3207@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <87zj4ulw8g.fsf@netris.org> <20150524073431.GA3725@debian> <87382m86c6.fsf@gnu.org> <87lhge11we.fsf@netris.org> <20150524201440.GA7409@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43250) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YwsGC-0004Ly-Ej for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2015 09:17:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YwsG8-0003M4-FC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2015 09:17:40 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:42353) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YwsG8-0003M0-9J for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2015 09:17:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20150524201440.GA7409@debian> (Andreas Enge's message of "Sun, 24 May 2015 22:14:40 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Andreas Enge skribis: > On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 10:33:05AM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote: >> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: >> > Should we revert that part of the commit, at least for packages for >> > which we don=E2=80=99t know? >> FWIW, I don't feel the need to revert, especially since it would entail >> more rebuilding, but in the future I would prefer to use the more >> conservative approach that you outlined above. > > Okay, both are fine with me. OK with Mark=E2=80=99s suggestion. Ludo=E2=80=99.