From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Simplify LLVM build. Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:50:32 -0400 Message-ID: <87oahwofcn.fsf@netris.org> References: <87r3n2o2ed.fsf@igalia.com> <20150817034338.5918ffdd@openmailbox.org> <87a8tqnhn3.fsf@igalia.com> <87zj1kbav5.fsf@netris.org> <87y4h19lhu.fsf@igalia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48260) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZTu1Z-0003O0-Kx for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:51:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZTu1V-0007nH-VR for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:51:05 -0400 Received: from world.peace.net ([50.252.239.5]:55027) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZTu1V-0007mj-FS for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:51:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87y4h19lhu.fsf@igalia.com> (Andy Wingo's message of "Mon, 24 Aug 2015 09:46:53 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andy Wingo Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Andy Wingo writes: > On Fri 21 Aug 2015 23:16, Mark H Weaver writes: > >> Andy Wingo writes: >> >>> If Guix has additional requirements they should be indicated >>> somewhere; did I miss the document? >> >> No, you didn't miss it. We have a lot to do, and writing precise >> documentation of our coding standards is not something we've yet found >> time for. I'm not sure it's something that could be precisely >> documented even if we tried. > > I'm pretty sure many things could be documented. Specifically the rules > about the commit line formatting and the format of messages adding new > packages or upgrading packages have been explained enough times that it > is wasting your time not to put them in a document :) Well, okay, you have a good point :) > Probably they should be put into some automatic linter as well. That would be more difficult. >> I'd like to push your commit with Eric's proposed commit log. >> Is that okay? > > Sure! Thank you Mark :) Pushed. Thanks to you both! Mark