From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] guix build: Add 'build-package'. Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 17:12:01 +0200 Message-ID: <87oagulc8u.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1437814197-6321-1-git-send-email-alezost@gmail.com> <1437814197-6321-7-git-send-email-alezost@gmail.com> <87zj1ou1i0.fsf@gnu.org> <878u972ea9.fsf@gmail.com> <87mvxe8frd.fsf@gnu.org> <87oahuvtah.fsf@gmail.com> <87si73u5no.fsf@gnu.org> <87bndfx6l1.fsf@gmail.com> <87io7ku0ys.fsf@gnu.org> <87fv2bh87b.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37835) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZePEl-0002A6-Bu for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 11:12:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZePEh-0002xs-CR for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 11:12:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87fv2bh87b.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Kost's message of "Fri, 18 Sep 2015 21:51:36 +0300") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Alex Kost Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Alex Kost skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s (2015-09-08 23:10 +0300) wrote: > >> Alex Kost skribis: [...] >>> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s (2015-08-26 14:12 +0300) wrote: >>> >>>> Maybe =E2=80=98build-package=E2=80=99 could go to (guix packages)? >>> >>> =E2=80=98build-package=E2=80=99 uses =E2=80=98show-=E2=80=A6=E2=80=99 p= rocedures from (guix ui) module. I >>> thought that adding this module to (guix packages) was not desired, or >>> is it OK? >> >> Right, sorry. So maybe leave in (guix build scripts) with a comment >> explaining that it doesn=E2=80=99t have a better place and is for use by= the >> Emacs UI. (Make sure to use the monadic style as suggested in a >> previous message.) > > So I suppose this comment is not needed anymore (right?) as Correct. > 'build-package' will beplaced in (guix scripts), and it looks like a > rather general procedure. For example, it may be used for something > like =E2=80=98guix build --package-from-file=E2=80=99 suggested by David: > . =E2=80=98guix package --install-from-file=E2=80=99 was committed but I don= =E2=80=99t think it actually needs =E2=80=98build-package=E2=80=99. > From ce35de1359ae11a2e73f129db4f7685985f3d041 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Alex Kost > Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 16:16:41 +0300 > Subject: [PATCH] scripts: Add 'build-package'. > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DUTF-8 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > > * guix/scripts/system.scm (maybe-build): Move to ... > * guix/scripts.scm: ...here. > (build-package): New procedure. > > Co-authored-by: Ludovic Court=C3=A8s OK! Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.