From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul van der Walt Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add xcompmgr Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 12:04:37 +0200 Message-ID: <87oafpoq8a.fsf@denknerd.org> References: <87si517rav.fsf@SIRIUSGUIX00.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87si51or31.fsf@denknerd.org> Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47388) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpZDI-00085u-CX for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 06:04:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpZDF-0007X5-5s for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 06:04:44 -0400 Received: from mx01.mykolab.com ([95.128.36.1]:34364 helo=mx-out01.mykolab.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpZDE-0007Ws-WC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 06:04:41 -0400 In-reply-to: <87si51or31.fsf@denknerd.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Cyrill Schenkel Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org ...and another thing while i'm at it, although i'm less sure about this one... On 2015-10-23 at 11:46, quoth Paul van der Walt: >> + (setenv "NOCONFIGURE" "t") Does that do what i think it does? If so, why not just use something like the following? (modify-phases %standard-phases (delete 'configure) ...) Ciao, p.