From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] gnu: Add AqBanking.
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 17:19:38 +0200
Message-ID: <87oa7ez6np.fsf@elephly.net>
References: <20160606132301.21077-1-rekado@elephly.net>
	<20160606132301.21077-5-rekado@elephly.net>
	<20160606142251.GB13186@jasmine>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47201)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1b9wJj-0002lz-Tn
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 11:19:52 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1b9wJg-0007T0-3Q
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 11:19:50 -0400
Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com ([74.201.84.163]:24550)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1b9wJf-0007So-QP
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 11:19:48 -0400
In-reply-to: <20160606142251.GB13186@jasmine>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org


Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:

> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 03:23:00PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>> * gnu/packages/gnucash.scm (aqbanking): New variable.
>
>> +    ;; AqBanking is licensed under the GPLv2 or GPLv3
>> +    (license (list license:gpl2+ license:gpl3+))))
>
> Should it be (list license:gpl2 license:gpl3) in that case?

Yes, I think you are right.

~~ Ricardo