From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: awesome: Add awesome-3.5 Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 09:59:51 +0000 Message-ID: <87oa4hgodk.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> References: <20160825030933.06c8d523@gmail.com> <87inup42zl.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87wpj5gpeg.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58210) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bcrRz-0005q9-O2 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 05:59:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bcrRx-00033g-IK for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 05:59:54 -0400 Received: from mithlond.libertad.in-berlin.de ([2001:67c:1400:2490::1]:57054 helo=beleriand.n0.is) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bcrRx-00032i-7G for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 05:59:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87wpj5gpeg.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: gno , guix-devel@gnu.org > Works for me (written from inside a running awesome-3.5.9). ng0@shadowwalker ~$ awesome --version awesome v3.5.9 (Mighty Ravendark) • Build: Sun Mar 06 14:05:54Z 2016 for x86_64 by gcc version 4.9.3 (@) • Compiled against Lua 5.2.4 (running with Lua 5.2) • D-Bus support: ✔ Having no dbus support will help with eventual hardening of Guix, but why do we not have it in awesome? And why would we we need it (dbus support) at all? I don't even know why I used to build it with dbus support before. Works either way. -- ng0 For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org