From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0 Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2016 16:34:51 +0200 Message-ID: <87oa45jblg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87y43albe9.fsf@gnu.org> <20160902201422.GA3701@jasmine> <8737lhm6rk.fsf@gnu.org> <20160903140613.GB12802@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38146) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bgC26-0005Cl-9H for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2016 10:34:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bgC22-00041p-4J for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2016 10:34:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160903140613.GB12802@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Sat, 3 Sep 2016 10:06:13 -0400") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Leo Famulari skribis: > On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 03:50:55PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> Leo Famulari skribis: >> > When I put "openssl" in the 'name' field, as attached, `guix build >> > openssl` gives me 1.1.0, which is not right. The other *-next packages >> > all seem to use "name-next" as the name. >>=20 >> Yes, but it=E2=80=99s different. Guile 2.1, for instance, is the develo= pment >> series, so it makes sense to give it a different name so users don=E2=80= =99t end >> up using the =E2=80=9Cwrong=E2=80=9D series. >>=20 >> Conversely, IIUC, OpenSSL 1.1.0 is the new stable series, no? > > 1.1.0 is the new stable series, but I haven't found any software that > can use the new interface yet. So, I don't want to make 1.1.0 the > default OpenSSL version in Guix. Does that make sense? Yes, but as long the =E2=80=98openssl=E2=80=99 refers to 1.0.x, it doesn=E2= =80=99t really matter than the =E2=80=9Copenssl=E2=80=9D package points to the latest one, no? U= se can still run =E2=80=9Cguix package -i openssl@1.0=E2=80=9D if they want. Ludo=E2=80=99.