From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] system: grub: Use librsvg to convert SVG to PNG
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 22:57:01 +0100
Message-ID: <87oa20npw2.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87lgzaloex.fsf@netris.org> <87fupilats.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87oa29wctc.fsf@gnu.org> <20161025000724.GA23897@jasmine>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44234)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1c1KZp-0004js-2X
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 17:57:10 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1c1KZm-00086A-0J
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 17:57:09 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20161025000724.GA23897@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Mon,
	24 Oct 2016 20:07:24 -0400")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:

> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 01:24:15AM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
>> > Is there are reason for not using guile-rsvg and guile-cairo?  Otherwi=
se
>> > I think it would be preferable (they=E2=80=99d need to be autoloaded s=
o that
>> > =E2=80=98make=E2=80=99 doesn=E2=80=99t fail when they=E2=80=99re missi=
ng, but that=E2=80=99s OK.)
>> >
>> > I found an example that Andy had posted:
>> >
>> >   https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-08/msg00753.html
>>=20
>> I hacked this a little bit a pushed as
>> ffde82c9ecf99524220e463055f4f18c8c9e7a81.
>
> A welcome change! But I think it needs a little more time in the
> kitchen:
>
> $ guix pull

[...]

> In unknown file:
>    ?: 0 [scm-error misc-error #f "~A ~S" ("no code for module" (rsvg)) #f]
>
> ERROR: In procedure scm-error:
> ERROR: no code for module (rsvg)

Indeed it wasn=E2=80=99t fully cooked.  ;-)  I see your message just now, b=
ut
others reported it on IRC and it got fixed in
8ce84bf1f5705f5280e8bf8f150ec2e859b045ee.

Ludo=E2=80=99.