Leo Famulari writes: > On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 12:59:33PM -0500, Kei Kebreau wrote: >> Yes. I see that diffoscope complains about missing 'xxd'. That may be >> useful to package (unless we already have it and I'm just oblivious). > > Does it break diffoscope or is it just a warning? Either way, we should > try to build diffoscope with all its optional dependencies. I see that you've already answered your question. To both of you, I expect that using xxd provides some benefit. For what it's worth, in Debian xxd/vim-common is recommended when installing diffoscope.