From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Services can now have a default value
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 14:48:00 +0200
Message-ID: <87o9uujngf.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87shl9qo7h.fsf@gnu.org> <877f2go3wn.fsf@zancanaro.id.au>
	<877f2gksbs.fsf@gnu.org> <8737d32abz.fsf@zancanaro.id.au>
	<87bmrr4ghh.fsf@gnu.org> <874lxjnzyx.fsf@zancanaro.id.au>
	<87bmrp8lk6.fsf@gnu.org> <8737d1nxbd.fsf@zancanaro.id.au>
	<87bmqx6nx2.fsf@zancanaro.id.au> <87a86g74ip.fsf@zancanaro.id.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58874)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1dAFPy-0007vQ-5t
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2017 08:48:06 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1dAFPv-0000oh-4o
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2017 08:48:06 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87a86g74ip.fsf@zancanaro.id.au> (Carlo Zancanaro's message of
	"Sun, 14 May 2017 08:53:18 +1000")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Carlo Zancanaro <carlo@zancanaro.id.au>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

Heya,

Carlo Zancanaro <carlo@zancanaro.id.au> skribis:

> On Sat, May 13 2017, Carlo Zancanaro wrote:
>> I've attached two patches, one of which is the definition of
>> define-service-type, and the other which is me changing the
>> exim-service-type definition to use it.
>
> It turns out these patches don't work at all. I wrote the code for them
> around a month ago and naively assumed they'd still work. They are quite
> broken, so maybe just ignore them. I'm playing around with it again now,
> so we'll see what I can come up with.

OK!  Nothing significant changed in the meantime, so perhaps it=E2=80=99s j=
ust a
matter of =E2=80=9Cmake clean-go && make=E2=80=9D?

BTW, I realized that this won=E2=80=99t be usable directly with services th=
at
use (gnu services configuration).  Maybe that=E2=80=99s OK as a first appro=
ach.

Ludo=E2=80=99.