From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: Guix on aarch64 Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 17:05:31 -0400 Message-ID: <87o9dnsep0.fsf@netris.org> References: <87mutm72n7.fsf@jnanam.net> <878t565k85.fsf@lassieur.org> <87k1oq6wgf.fsf@jnanam.net> <87bm9tbrx9.fsf@netris.org> <87zhxcoy0p.fsf@gnu.org> <87efelw1fr.fsf@netris.org> <20180826185922.GB18912@jasmine.lan> <87tvng1bib.fsf@elephly.net> <87bm9ntyjh.fsf@netris.org> <87zhx7bohb.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39323) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fuOj9-0000fd-KZ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 17:07:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fuOj4-0002Qn-QU for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 17:07:11 -0400 Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:47926) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fuOj4-0002Qb-Mb for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 17:07:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87zhx7bohb.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Mon, 27 Aug 2018 21:26:08 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Benjamin Slade Hi Ricardo, Ricardo Wurmus writes: > I think you are overreacting and I really don=E2=80=99t think the sarcast= ic > response is justified. This kind of communication is very demotivating > to me. Believe it or not, I wasn't conscious of the fact that I was being sarcastic or hostile. Sorry about that. I'm grasping at straws trying to understand your reasoning. In general, I _do_ think that sometimes it's better to motivate people to work on a proper solution, by refusing temporary workarounds. > If this is an urgent problem (and your hostility indicates that it is) > then by all means go ahead and add one of the aarch64 build nodes to > hydra and remove the same from berlin. I lack access to both Berlin and to the Aarch64 build slaves, so I can't do this. Note that I'm not asking for access; I actively do not want it. Also, Ludovic has stated multiple times that he prefers for the Aarch64 build slaves to be connected to Berlin, not Hydra, and I would not implement a contrary policy without his consent. Mark