From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Sassmannshausen Subject: Re: Promoting the GNU Kind Communication Guidelines? Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 12:13:36 +0100 Message-ID: <87o9bd9fa7.fsf@gmail.com> References: <11169507.O9o76ZdvQC@aleksandar-ixtreme-m5740> <20181029092355.403e3855@alma-ubu> Reply-To: alex.sassmannshausen@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45276) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gH5UN-0001Zw-5Y for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 07:13:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gH5UM-0000QE-2J for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 07:13:43 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x530.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::530]:35095) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gH5UL-0000FW-Rk for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 07:13:41 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-x530.google.com with SMTP id e2-v6so6912636edn.2 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 04:13:39 -0700 (PDT) In-reply-to: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: t_w_@freenet.de Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi Thorsten, Thorsten Wilms writes: > On 29/10/2018 09.23, Bj=C3=B6rn H=C3=B6fling wrote: >> Example: Sage Sharp left the kernel development: >> >> https://sage.thesharps.us/2015/10/05/closing-a-door/ >> >> How good would have been the USB 3.0 driver now, or the >> community documentation, when he would have continued his work with >> passion in a respectful community? > > Sage may feel you mis-gendered them, as they prefer they/them. Please > be respectful ;) Thank you for letting us know; I certainly would aim want to respect their preference. > Sage advocates the CoC and called an opponent a "rape apologist", > based on not just a mean spirited interpretation, but rather factually > wrong. I think this qualifies as slander. > > https://twitter.com/_sagesharp_/status/1042769399596437504 > using as reference: > http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Rape_apology_on_LCA_mailing_list I'm sorry, I'm not clear on where the factual incorrectness was in the things you linked to above. I did not follow the original debate in detail so am going on the links you provide. > This is a prime example of what may make one suspicious of CoCs and > the Covenant in particular, when people who want them do things like > that. It looks like war, with the usual effects on truth and fairness. I'm not seeing this from what you linked to. Best wishes, Alex