From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: Merging staging? Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 13:36:54 -0500 Message-ID: <87o99gvyce.fsf@netris.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58996) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ga3Cw-0003qL-LE for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 13:38:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ga3Ct-0006yl-4T for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 13:38:06 -0500 Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:41364) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ga3Cs-0006wT-Vb for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 13:38:03 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Julien Lepiller's message of "Thu, 20 Dec 2018 15:58:09 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Julien Lepiller Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi Julien, Julien Lepiller writes: > I'd like to get staging merged soon, as it wasn't for quite some > time. Here are some stats about the current state of substitutes for > staging: > > According to guix weather, we have: > > | architecture | berlin | hydra | > +--------------+--------+-------+ > | x86_64 | 36.5% | 81.7% | > | i686 | 23.8% | 71.0% | > | aarch64 | 22.2% | 00.0% | > | armhf | 17.0% | 45.6% | > > What should the next step be? I think we should wait until the coverage on armhf and aarch64 have become larger, for the sake of users on those systems. Also, I've seen some commits that make me wonder if hydra is still being configured as an authorized substitute server on new Guix installations. Do you know? If 'berlin' is the only substitute server by default, then we certainly need to wait for those numbers to get higher, no? What do you think? Regards, Mark