unofficial mirror of guix-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>
To: Jelle Licht <jlicht@fsfe.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, GNU Guix maintainers <guix-maintainers@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Merging the “binary” NPM importer?
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 14:37:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o88cc1v5.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <864ka7qwz1.fsf@fsfe.org> (Jelle Licht's message of "Sun, 26 Sep 2021 15:37:22 +0200")

Hello!

(Cc: guix-maintainers to check whether everyone is on-board with the
idea before going further.)

Jelle Licht <jlicht@fsfe.org> skribis:

> The major ones I can think of are;
> - Be rebased on current master (or perhaps core-updates-fixed?)
> - tests
> - documentation

Yeah, these three things would be needed to get it in ‘master’.  A quick
review would also be nice, mostly to catch stylistic issue, code
duplication, and to validate the testing strategy.

Would the two of you willing to help with this?

> Could you perhaps list some additional blockers?  We can always refine
> and improve on an acceptable upstreamed version, since it will be a
> once-and-done tool instead of some stable API.

Once the basics are in place, you could always improve the tool later on
as you see fit.

Thanks,
Ludo’.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-28 12:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-19 13:01 Adding extra package importers pinoaffe
2021-09-19 14:44 ` Maxime Devos
2021-09-23 20:28 ` Merging the “binary” NPM importer? Ludovic Courtès
2021-09-23 23:13   ` pinoaffe
2021-09-26 13:37     ` Jelle Licht
2021-09-26 21:34       ` pinoaffe
2021-09-26 22:32         ` Philip McGrath
2021-09-27  8:57           ` pinoaffe
2021-09-27 15:13             ` Katherine Cox-Buday
2021-09-28 12:37       ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
2021-09-25  3:17   ` Christine Lemmer-Webber
2021-10-08  1:51     ` Maxim Cournoyer
2021-10-08 14:16       ` Katherine Cox-Buday
2021-10-11 10:13         ` zimoun
2021-10-11 17:12           ` pinoaffe
2021-10-12 18:21       ` Timothy Sample
2021-10-14  1:26         ` Maxim Cournoyer
2021-10-14 13:58           ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-10-14 14:54             ` Opining on "modern" development practices (was Re: Merging the “binary” NPM importer?) Katherine Cox-Buday
2021-10-21 19:39               ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-10-28 15:01                 ` Katherine Cox-Buday
2021-10-29 12:33                   ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-10-29 14:54                     ` Katherine Cox-Buday

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87o88cc1v5.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=ludo@gnu.org \
    --cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=guix-maintainers@gnu.org \
    --cc=jlicht@fsfe.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).