From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:306:2d92::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id 6BWhOCSuAmVIeQAA9RJhRA:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 08:54:29 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:306:2d92::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id 6BWhOCSuAmVIeQAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 08:54:29 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80499550C8 for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 08:54:28 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1694674468; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=dk5q1fk9O8VsGpv5OveN7PuDkMC/gV2AJEvJvwm6GFNmNmZUQuKTzEjXKUKtdHoTung8g6 3qgYF8PdKW9DTPE7rB4Z1s8LhFKey2FhzdoTX9JjrgG4SvPWE9t0iBZ4sd3lD+BY+GE0HG wcNDD67/h0ZPX59baU4Z6QQCO7uT7hxQ9yLdG5YpvCGpc+mcvAs2nB1JT9UagvtF2reEXE q+/Onhrk6QzXNe7nRxJ0xr31uBhshIufzrvTn23MxhiCwt3A5sFp+mKp30kSf8OuwmSx9O jvd4/AEKAu2eBgf8UKHEknSWTDCDEnIoFxActHFU4toBiEi2R36i/YCQvtI7vQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1694674468; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post; bh=wqpUnbhSKbIVIbE8M5rx83wC0zZNUjWP1tOob7Aofpo=; b=WcObNL/JokxNtk3VYbx8MgRcBSYv+CSfp9Afs8hXdb38ggaS5DoVs0HjnD4v2HKu3p54hY Taw56iy5BF/54wL+tGNodwUGa0hoGxAJsPm80UAARAxIIxhczNTDpJxI+3j5iBR/G75GEm wKkkuEMNGEQzh3qhO7xs+NrlNzn61ehxVajJpfzeJLcq1VJUkPaCKX2jRljj/9Wjztt9GP SR/6zQezYn5tDtIFHxbQcu0cZA084UP+Apyg9e0qcveEPmT2jjx3bSPCJ4NNf5am7/oW3B bRi/dZe583bxjvnouV3Hs5u7earuChW63hFd8voFcFDvdnQouXLTSXNdsiZFrQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qggEl-0001GN-3i; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 02:54:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qggEf-0001Ej-6H for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 02:53:58 -0400 Received: from ns13.heimat.it ([46.4.214.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qggEc-000156-C4 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 02:53:56 -0400 Received: from localhost (ip6-localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns13.heimat.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DD983009C0; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 06:53:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at ns13.heimat.it Received: from ns13.heimat.it ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ns13.heimat.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FdyrmvKTv_QF; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 06:53:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bourrache.mug.xelera.it (unknown [93.56.171.217]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ns13.heimat.it (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9DCFC3009B9; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 06:53:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from roquette.mug.biscuolo.net (roquette [10.38.2.14]) by bourrache.mug.xelera.it (Postfix) with SMTP id E529929BFC12; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 08:53:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: (nullmailer pid 5515 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 14 Sep 2023 06:53:48 -0000 From: Giovanni Biscuolo To: Simon Tournier Cc: Attila Lendvai , Maxim Cournoyer , guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: to PR or not to PR, is /that/ the question? In-Reply-To: <867cotybna.fsf@gmail.com> Organization: Xelera.eu References: <87sf7o67ia.fsf@elephly.net> <9269133a74e06bfc5ee5bfeee0342ba2f5beaeb1.camel@gmail.com> <87tts44d2y.fsf@elephly.net> <4c85b742e29ebbf7fe3cde3f72961269ec26218c.camel@gmail.com> <87cyyr3zdc.fsf@elephly.net> <87fs3lj8tn.fsf@gmail.com> <07680e309df1fe42da11d9e3a6c33de40f82bf09.camel@gmail.com> <87r0n4fss3.fsf@gmail.com> <871qf3xxjm.fsf@gmail.com> <874jjzfhx0.fsf@gmail.com> <87y1ha9jj6.fsf@xelera.eu> <867cotybna.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 08:53:47 +0200 Message-ID: <87o7i59res.fsf@xelera.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=46.4.214.66; envelope-from=g@xelera.eu; helo=ns13.heimat.it X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.23 X-Spam-Score: -4.23 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 80499550C8 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx2.migadu.com X-TUID: CcSo1PAZOXxB --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Simon Simon Tournier writes: > Thank you for your detailed message. Sorry, I have not read all the > details because I have been lost. Sorry! Forgive me since I am not able to summarize the details without losing content. > What do you want to explain? In the context of this increasing cognitive overheading thread... As I wrote: =C2=ABI don't think thay adopting a =C2=ABweb based PR model=C2= =BB (whatever the term "pull request" means, editor note) for the Guix project is a good idea.=C2=BB To remain /in topic/: I think that adopting a =C2=ABweb based PR model=C2= =BB will definitely _not_ decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors. Also, replacing (or adding to) the current "integration request" email based workflow with a "web based PR model" (that _imply_ a web based patch review strictly connected with the choosen "forge"?) would be an /overwelming/ cognitive overhead for all. Last but not least, I also think that adding a patch review system like Gerrit or Gerrit, Phabricator, and Review Board would not only _increase_ the overall cognitive overhead but is also /technically/ _broken_. Why I think all this things? Well, I'm sorry but it's a _very_ long story and is all written down in the /details/. (id:87y1ha9jj6.fsf@xelera.eu aka https://yhetil.org/guix/87y1ha9jj6.fsf@xel= era.eu/) [...] I'm done with this thread, sorry; I'll drift alone :-)=20 Happy hacking, Gio' =2D-=20 Giovanni Biscuolo Xelera IT Infrastructures --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJABAEBCgAqFiEERcxjuFJYydVfNLI5030Op87MORIFAmUCrfwMHGdAeGVsZXJh LmV1AAoJENN9DqfOzDkSv5QQAJFPbDhroIQa5Iy+TEtEmoolXn22uNZAMsEaB2jp weSiSHNhRqL0W9xzty/wDLIZUIvoUfC5j6YCv9/y1RZz6WM4RTRU+txP8Hh+9ZLW HxTlLFZwUr5LvTrv2HWGNy5c6kuUFp3138Ml8vOk2z+elpTkZLqYn6OAJfcsgVOL UHRriN9sbsdO/jRVYHI9YTa7nKx8ak0m0mWQJ6F8EzuBLEzzi6B1nbR/P2FTg9KV jfP+j37V5G1HEmc1ltiVaYrRLC+ozNNIXXfMd2z9A2HS71tZxRiWBnOem++KryXX PnqN1oVkse9XEvW9Z9XG4NAx/kTJjlhYXg1t5iKH+bj91jfhd4kyvhCZoYbGtSD5 LZmFZBfyBcPz7L2CgbXmJSSGtztgCFuLrFdUdK+1ql6ZtKkSR+VO0jaW6WDGAOA6 KNIfqkzMIrwDNGhP5zdbWQNbrv8bG/Sc8gkYbg0O0HKZ0S3PvkOhctBsePfU9LiY XuA50vCHAx6OM45y4xfUZrAIQU7Mi3FcRoB06WzWhuz9wCarIBroKCtqJ4CFu8ZT 7jtmi2ZxoWx5nNuoeHMEqiHjEg4gluLnyHWniuK6Df0tGA//ffPuyRxlV1r1LCsG YV7nW0yOUTAuL8gL5MYjbF4fauD/Rv8taQ4EOmxZEBk9OrlZnLVON1Rfhnzje+33 ZUom =oP6u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--