unofficial mirror of guix-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Omar Tarabai <tarabai@devegypt.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: GUIX on fedora 14
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 23:55:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mwj79zbl.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK9pnb5iAV20Yf1=jbr58y7ogyK-ue8LgBzfXEFzJbZzZ24-7A@mail.gmail.com> (Omar Tarabai's message of "Tue, 7 Jan 2014 14:57:54 +0100")

Hello,

Omar Tarabai <tarabai@devegypt.com> skribis:

> I have Guix 0.5 installed on a fedora 14, 2.6.32 kernel.
>
> Running the following:
> guix package --verbose -i tar
>
> I get the error:
> guix package: error: build failed: unable to fork: Operation not permitted
>
> I traced the error to the clone() operation in build.cc.

Right.  The original report is at <http://bugs.gnu.org/15209>.

However, CLONE_NEWNET & co. appeared in 2.6.24 according to clone(2), so
this kernel should have them.  Perhaps the libc headers lack the
definitions; could you check if they’re in /usr/include/bits/sched.h?
What libc version is it?

> As mentioned by Ludovic in a previous conversation with Matthias
> Wachs, it seems to be a problem of a missing capability CAP_SYS_ADMIN.
> I tried running the daemon as root only or with
> --build-users-group=guix-builder but I get the same error. I also
> tried isolating the clone operation in a test script to verify the
> problem, fails again (running as root).
>
> I tried removing all the CLONE_* flags as recommended by Ludovic, I get the
> error:
> build error: cannot set loopback interface flags: Permission denied
>
> I assume its because of the missing CLONE_NEWNET

Yes.  You could comment out the few lines that set up the loopback
interface in build.cc, line 2074 onwards.  The global ‘lo’ interface
will be visible in the build environment anyway.

Let us know how far that gets.

> It seems that for some reason on this system, processes started with root
> privileges does not get the CAP_SYS_ADMIN capability.

What makes you think so?  To me it seems to be about working around the
assumptions that there’s a separate network interface name space, etc.

I hope this helps.  What would be best is to switch to a newer kernel
and libc.  :-)

Thanks,
Ludo’.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-07 23:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-07 13:57 GUIX on fedora 14 Omar Tarabai
2014-01-07 22:55 ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
2014-01-08 22:15   ` Omar Tarabai
2014-01-08 22:39     ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-01-09 13:30       ` Omar Tarabai
2014-01-09 23:01         ` Ludovic Courtès

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87mwj79zbl.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=ludo@gnu.org \
    --cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=tarabai@devegypt.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).