From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] gnu: inkscape: New module Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 14:49:17 +0100 Message-ID: <87mwi58yaq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1391526759-18655-1-git-send-email-jmd@gnu.org> <1391526759-18655-3-git-send-email-jmd@gnu.org> <87txcea31t.fsf@gnu.org> <20140205072604.GA4861@jocasta.intra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42175) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WB2vr-0005mk-Vz for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 08:54:34 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WB2vl-0004yK-Lf for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 08:54:27 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20140205072604.GA4861@jocasta.intra> (John Darrington's message of "Wed, 5 Feb 2014 08:26:04 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: John Darrington Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, John Darrington John Darrington skribis: > On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 12:09:02AM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote: [...] > > + (description "Inkscape is a free vector graphics editor simil= ar to > > +proprietary competitors. What sets Inkscape apart is its use of S= calable > > +Vector Graphics (SVG), an open XML-based W3C standard, as the nat= ive format.")=20=20=20 >=20=20=20=20=20=20 > I removed the ???free??? and the reference to proprietary competitor= s. > > Fair enough. The blurb on the website mentions them by name. I decided t= o drop > the names. If you want to omit any mention altogether, I don't have any = objection. Yeah, what we agreed on long ago was to not mention =E2=80=9Cfree=E2=80=9D = in descriptions (or similar), because everything is free in the distro. Also the GCS have long recommended against referring to non-free software, and it clearly doesn=E2=80=99t bring much here (the situation may= be different for software that aims for interoperability with non-free software, like LibreDWG or Octave.) > > + (license license:gpl2))) ;; Somewhat ambiguous whether v2 or = v2+ is intended >=20=20=20=20=20=20 > It???s actually GPLv2+ since the source files do not specify the ver= sion. > > It kind of does indirectly. It says "Under GPL - See the file COPYING" and > COPYING contains the text for v2. I thought it safer to assume v2 only. GPLv2 reads: If the Program does not specify a version number of this License, you may choose any version ever published by the Free Software Foundation. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.