From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Subject: Re: 0001-gnu-compression-Update-to-1.2.8.patch
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 18:44:17 -0500
Message-ID: <87mw52eai6.fsf@netris.org>
References: <CAFtzXzOPHDA6=jdhTd6vdrkVA-ZpEduw8AxoyFNcwnx7XPH8Gw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43240)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mhw@netris.org>) id 1YGcHi-0004tS-Uk
	for Guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 18:44:35 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mhw@netris.org>) id 1YGcHd-0005Sk-Vk
	for Guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 18:44:34 -0500
Received: from world.peace.net ([50.252.239.5]:53154)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mhw@netris.org>) id 1YGcHd-0005Pm-Qy
	for Guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 18:44:29 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAFtzXzOPHDA6=jdhTd6vdrkVA-ZpEduw8AxoyFNcwnx7XPH8Gw@mail.gmail.com>
	(Manolis Ragkousis's message of "Mon, 26 Jan 2015 23:16:52 +0000")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Manolis Ragkousis <manolis837@gmail.com>
Cc: Guix-devel <Guix-devel@gnu.org>

Manolis Ragkousis <manolis837@gmail.com> writes:
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: compression: Update to 1.2.8.

This first line should be "gnu: zlib: Update to 1.2.8".  In general,
when modifying a package, the package name belongs there, not the module
name.

     Thanks!
       Mark