From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich =?utf-8?Q?Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1?= =?utf-8?Q?=2FKammer?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Patch Qt 5.4 for i686. Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 21:07:19 +0200 Message-ID: <87mw1xpcpk.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> References: <87r3r9q42n.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59136) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YlixB-0005Df-Uw for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:07:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ylix8-0004Yz-0F for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:07:57 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-x231.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::231]:36013) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ylix7-0004P1-Pq for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:07:53 -0400 Received: by wgen6 with SMTP id n6so60082918wge.3 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 12:07:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from taylan.uni.cx (p2003007A0A22AB200213E8FFFEED36FB.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:7a:a22:ab20:213:e8ff:feed:36fb]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id be3sm270140wib.21.2015.04.24.12.07.21 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 24 Apr 2015 12:07:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87r3r9q42n.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> ("Taylan Ulrich \=\?utf-8\?Q\?\=5C\=22Bay\=C4\=B1rl\=C4\=B1\=2FKammer\=5C\=22\=22's\?\= message of "Fri, 24 Apr 2015 11:16:16 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: guix-devel@gnu.org taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kammer") writes: > It will take my machine another ~7 hours to build Qt so that I can > verify that this works; on the meanwhile sending it in FYI and for > stylistic review. The patch does not solve the problem after all. :-( I should have taken a closer look; this patches the in-tree Mesa headers, which are of course not used when building with system Mesa. I will investigate further but don't hold your breath. Although in worst case we could build with Qt's in-tree copy of Mesa. Taylan