From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: MAME emulator is giving incentive to use non-free software Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 18:15:43 +0200 Message-ID: <87mvphjm4w.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160328215516.GA27719@protected.rcdrun.com> <20160329002620.GB6484@jookia-eeepc.Home> <20160329044242.GA1239@protected.rcdrun.com> <20160329062711.GA17752@jookia-eeepc.Home> <20160329073040.GA20807@protected.rcdrun.com> <20160329082522.GA10814@jookia-eeepc.Home> <20160329120051.GD13512@protected.rcdrun.com> <87h9fpnz1o.fsf@gnu.org> <20160329145251.GB26383@protected.rcdrun.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35580) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1akwJ6-0007FY-KO for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 12:15:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1akwJ1-0002nt-35 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 12:15:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160329145251.GB26383@protected.rcdrun.com> (Jean Louis's message of "Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:52:51 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Jean Louis Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Jean Louis skribis: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 04:23:15PM +0200, Mathieu Lirzin wrote: [...] >> I have no interest in MAME, but refusing to distribute it makes >> assumption about what people are going to use it for. The fact that >> apparently =E2=80=9Cmost=E2=80=9D people are running non-free stuff on t= op of it, is not >> a valid argument in term of software freedom or compliance with FSDG. >> It could be valid for other ethical issues but IMO Guix should focus >> only on Free Software ethics. > > I am find if it is going to be solved by a compliance officer. There=E2=80=99s compliance officer going to tell us whether a proposed exte= nsion to the FSDG is good or not. The FSDG are community rules, not a law. The right thing to do IMO is to discuss those rules here and on gnu-linux-libre, where other free distro people and FSF staff are reading. Ludo=E2=80=99.