From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: iyzsong@member.fsf.org (=?utf-8?B?5a6L5paH5q2m?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add gnome-sudoku and qqwing Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:25:58 +0800 Message-ID: <87mvoyowi1.fsf@member.fsf.org> References: <9eb39f4bf7ca7efde861cd9c5c5c38b0@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41926) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqEFz-0003i2-WA for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 02:26:32 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqEFv-0001uL-DV for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 02:26:31 -0400 Received: from smtp6.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.40]:41806) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqEFv-0001uC-7K for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 02:26:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <9eb39f4bf7ca7efde861cd9c5c5c38b0@openmailbox.org> (kei@openmailbox.org's message of "Tue, 12 Apr 2016 12:59:06 -0400") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: kei@openmailbox.org Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org kei@openmailbox.org writes: > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add gnome-sudoku and qqwing > Date: 2016-04-12 12:58 > From: kei@openmailbox.org > To: Leo Famulari > > On 2016-04-11 17:57, Leo Famulari wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 12:06:17PM -0400, kei@openmailbox.org wrote: >>> I decided to add gnome-sudoku to gnome.scm because of how a new >>> version >>> is released with each new version of GNOME. Also, since qqwing >>> seems to >>> be used only by gnome-sudoku, I moved it over to gnome.scm as well. >> >> Okay, if gnome-sudoku has to stay in sync with GNOME, then I'd say it >> makes some sense to put it in gnome.scm. Is there some GNOME package >> that sets the version for the rest of our GNOME ecosystem? Should we be >> pulling the version from some other package? >> >> I still think the best place is games.scm with the other games. >> >> CC-ing our GNOME expert, =E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6, for some advice. I prefer gnome.scm for it (and gnome-mines, etc) too, since those packages follow the release cycle of GNOME, and don't have their own homepages. > [...] > > QQwing is added to game-development.scm, as it's more of a tool to > facilitate > gameplay than a game per se. Agree :-) I take the description of qqwing from debian: . I think debian take it from the manpage. Pushed, thanks for the patch and reviews!